Page 59 - Fenning_Scoland
P. 59

1689 - The First Jacobite Rising -An eyewitness account of the Battle of Dunkeld






 The 'Glorious Revolution' of 1688/89 was largely bloodless. Following this, the 'Jacobites', supporters of the exiled King James, raised a~ army in Scotland. On. 27t11  July
 1689 it fought the government forces at Killiecrankie and .def~ated them., Le~s t~an fo~r we~k~ ~ater,  at the.Battle ~f Dunkeld,~he Jacob1tes wer~ defeated. This proved
 to be a decisive battle in the rising and is described by 'H1stonc Scotland as  an incredibly s1gmf1cant battle in the history of 17  Century Scotland .





 I told you my Andrew was gone the beginning of July to serve as surgeon's mate with Lieutenant-Colonel Cleland's regiment [Lt.-Col. William Cleland of the Cameronian Regiment
 which had been fonned In May 1689].

 After 6 weeks marching to and again In Argyllshlre, as they returned to Stir/Ing he got llberty to come In here two days having got no pay to get .... from me and on his return they
 marched on the 16[th] from Stirling to Perth. On the 17/th] they marched to Dunkeld, [the] Duke of Hamllton [the King's Commissioner] procuring the Councll to post them there In
 the most dangerous post In the Kingdom In the very face of the enemies and a disaffected people, and no assistance nearer than Perth 10 miles distant. When [they} came there
 some of the town's people that were friends (Whereof there were very few there) told them the enemy was In great numbers In the hi/ls not far off.

 Whereupon on the Sabbath, the 18{th], all hands were at work to make an entrenchment for their better safety and to prepare faggots of straw and tar to burn the town In case the
 enemy possessed It, because It was generally possessed by the people that were gone to the enemy and there was no defending the town nor keeping their own entrenchment ff the
 enemy had It. That day, by 6 In the afternoon, the enemy appeared In a small party on a hi/I within near a musket shot of them. They sent out a party and made them retire but they
 pursued them not. That night Col. Cleland encouraged the men as he could and went through the guards all that night continually expecting a surprise, but on the Monday, when
 day appeared, there was no enemy to be seen.


 They continued all Monday fortifying themselves and that afternoon came to their help my Lord Cardros [Henry Erskine, r' Lord Cardross] with 3 troops of his dragoons and
 Egllngton's and young Grubbet's two troops of horse. On Tuesday the 20th, In the morning, appeared a party of about 600 of the enemy whereupon Cleland commanded out 200 of
 24t11 August 1689. Letter from  Edinburgh to Rotterdam via London,   his men with the horse and dragoons. The foot llned their battle with pikes and advanced with the horse and dragoons on the wings. Atter our men fired, the enemy thought to have
 charged 5d paid to London and with  X/' stuivers charge for London   broke[n] In upon them with sword and to get as they had done on Mackay when he was defeat[ed] [Major-General Hugh Mackay, who had been defeated at the Battle of Kllllecrankle]
 to Rotterdam. On reverse, a superb London Bishop mark AV/30.
 but they defend[ed] so well with the pikes that they were, with great loss, repulsed.  Then the horse and dragoons both shamefully fled. As our men wef9 pursuing [them], a man
 The letter is extremely significant and of importance historically as it   started up among the corn and waved to the Captain and when brought fin] he told [that] he was a drummer of Mackay's taken at the last fight [Kllllecrankle] and had taken on with
 contains a rare eyewitness account of the Battle of Dunkeld which   the highland men and had dropped(?] down In the flight to tell them not to pursue, for there was a great body of men of about 4000 on the back of the hi/I that would cut you all off
 took place just three  days earlier,  on  21•t August.  The  account is
 from returning. Leaving men posted on both hands in woods so they returned. That day they had but 3 men slightly wounded and no other loss.
 that of Andrew Livingston, a surgeon's mate In the pro-government
 Cameronian  Regiment.  It was written  down  by William  Livingston   That night Col. Ramsay, who Is the commanding officer In that country lying at Perth, sent orders to Cardros and the 2 troops horse Immediately to march to him (though there was
 and sent to his brother-in-law, Andrew Russell.
 no enemy there nor could be till this post were quiet). And they, ...... against all Cleland's or his officers' lncllnatlons, marched back to Perth. Then they began verily to belleve the
 The account gives  remarkable  detail  of the events  preceding  and
 truth, that they were sold to the enemy and spent the night as became Christians and soldiers.
 during  the  battle,  including  the  deaths  of  the  Cameronians'
 commanding officer and his second-in-command. Several details in
 On the 21/st], by day, they saw the enemy on the old ground, first but a small party, but Increasing continually tlll 8 In the morning that they came down to the number of 4000. Our
 the account do not appear to have been recorded in any published
 men made good their post and fired smartly upon them from all quarters, being surrounded. The enemy ceased the town. Col. Cleland went with 90 [men] and set It [Dunkeld] on
 histories  and  also  answer  the  questions  scholars  have  had
 regarding the length of the battle.   fire, but on his return, being the last man that entered the trenches and, as he thought, out of hazard, as he turned to wipe the sweat off his face, was shot out at a window through
 Of  major  historical  interest,  running  through  the  account,  is  the   the heart and ....... Truly I may say the gallantest man that Scotland ever had; after him Major Henderson [Major James Henderson, Cle/and's second-In-command] had his Jett arm
 Cameronians'  strong  suspicion  that they  (only  700  - 800  strong)   shot by a cannonball,  for the enemy had 3 cannon, yet continuing In his office was shot through the  body and thrice in the head, and so was carried off. This was at 10 and
 were  being  deliberately  sacrificed  to  the  stronger  Jacobite  army
 concealed, and the defence [was} so gallantly maintained that at 12 the enemy took them[selves] to their heels, having lost many officers and 300 of their men; our poor men not
 (around 4000 - 5000)  and had  not been  expected to survive and
 win the battle.   being one to 6 of the enemy durst not pursue [them] and so continued In their retrenchment, till [at] 11 at night that Col. Ramsay came to their relief. They have lost but 8 men killed
 and 20 or 30 wounded but the loss of the two [Colonel Cleland & Major Henderson] Is greater than other thousands. Everybody suspects (and I hope the Lord will deliver it) that this
 A  transcript  of  that  part  of  the  letter  describing  the  battle  is
 provided, with modern spelling, punctuation and paragraphs. Some   regiment hath been wickedly delivered to the enemy to be destroyed, but their valour hath been, through the Lord's goodness, very conspicuous.
 additions for better readability/understanding are in square brackets
 [  ] and missing or illegible words are indicated by a row of dots ......   This is my Andrew's account and [it] agrees with what others hath writ[ten] of that action.
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64